![]() ![]() Stuckey’s argument and remind ourselves of the teachings we hold dear to our hearts. We refuse, to allow secularists to define terms like man and woman, why allow a protestant to define what our Catholic doctrines teach? When wrong terms are wrong they should be identified and illuminated for the continued growth of Christ’s body. George Farmer for his many virtuous defenses of the faith in the debate, missed a key opportunity to undermine a presupposition of the opponent’s argument. In short, yes, because that which becomes familiar becomes forgotten. That said, is it worth sifting through the thoughts of a convert on a topic that is such a commonplace practice of our faith. Jerome’s caliber, of course not, but neither should we offer arguments as if we were theme park caricaturists. Stuckey offer objections to a topic in ways that communicate a lack of thought and or study. As a convert to the Catholic faith, I find it troubling when protestants like Ms. Stuckey’s argument against “Heavenly Intercession” is so perplexing. I appreciated simple and logical they seem useful to a man who is attempting to convert to a branch of Christian faith radically different than his upbringing. Throughout my swimming of the Tiber, it was this doctrine that at face value seemed the simplest and most logical. The first Catholic claim I took seriously as a protestant centered heavily on the intercession of the Saints. ![]() A Convert’s Response to Allie Beth Stuckey
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |